By Sandra Basu
WASHINGTON — After years of working to modernize its electronic health record internally, a senior IT official indicated last month that a shift to a commercial EHR is the likely path forward for VA.
“It is going to be my goal and my charge that we go commercial to the greatest extent possible, because we have not had a great track record on developing software,” said Acting Assistant Secretary for Information and Technology and CIO Rob C. Thomas.
VA and DoD decided to use different EHRs back in 2013. At the time, VA said it would modernize VistA while DoD said it would buy a commercially-available system, which it rolled out at its first medical facility last month.
Last year, VA appeared to shift directions when officials said that, while it would release VistA 4 in fiscal year 2018, the system might not be the EHR that it uses in the future.
Thomas told lawmakers at a House committee hearing that VA completed a cost-benefit analysis of continued development of VistA as well as other EHR options, completed at the end of December of 2016.
While he said he was “confident” the agency was “going to go commercial,” he cautioned that he “cannot speak” for then-VA Secretary nominee David J. Shulkin, MD, who was awaiting confirmation at the time of the hearing.
“I’ve worked with him the past 18 months; he’s very decisive,” Thomas explained.
Thomas made his comments at a hearing held by the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs on VA’s major IT projects. Committee chairman Rep. Phil Roe, MD (R-TN), pointed out to VA officials that VA is in its “third major attempt to modernize VistA in the past decade.”
Asked by Roe whether he agreed with the statement that VistA “lacks the tools and extensive analytics capabilities of a modern commercial EHR,” Thomas said he did.
Roe then wondered aloud why VA would “continue down that road [of modernization]” when DoD “swallowed the bitter pill” and opted to use a commercial EHR, adding, “I’ve been sitting here for eight years listening to how it’s going to get better and so forth.”
Lawmakers also had questions about the timelines of VA’s different IT projects. If VA uses a commercial EHR, Rep. Julia Brownley (D-CA) asked how long it would take to implement and whether a timeline exists.
Thomas did not have an exact timeline, but said, once the decision is made, VA will get back to lawmakers with some answers.
Brownley suggested that the VA’s IT timelines never seem clear to her.
“It always feels like the goal posts are moving, and I can’t keep track of the movement on those goal posts. It’s testified in one committee that says this, and then we go to the next meeting and then [VA] says, ‘Oh, well we had some delays,’” she said.
Other lawmakers also appeared frustrated by the pace of progress. Rep. Tim Walz (D-MN) said that he continues to have concerns that, if DoD and VA are using two different EHRs, interoperability of records won’t fully occur.
“I cannot talk to a veteran and justify why we are going to spend countless dollars for two systems that may not communicate, that do not improve the veterans’ experience, that do not make it more secure and that do not guard taxpayer dollars,” Walz said.
Also testifying at the hearing was David Powner, the Government Accountability Office’s director for IT Management Issues.
When it comes to the EHR, Powner bluntly told lawmakers that “VA needs to let go of VistA and go with the commercial system.” He said that the “uncertainty” regarding this decision is unacceptable.
“Further, we see no justification for VA and DoD pursuing separate systems,” he added.
Powner also told lawmakers that VA spends a large portion of its IT budget on maintaining older IT systems.
“Of the $4.5 billion, only about $500 million goes toward developing or acquiring new systems. The remaining goes primarily toward operational systems, many of which are old, inefficient and difficult to maintain,” Powner explained.
He pointed to older systems, such as a 53-year-old system that automates time and attendance for VA employees, as well as VA’s 51-year-old system that tracks claims filed by veterans as well as eligibility and dates of death. VA has plans to retire both systems.
Powner also made note of VA’s plans to modernize its patient-scheduling system and a need for a decision on the approach forward for that.
For his part, Thomas sought to reassure lawmakers that VA has been embarking on a transformation of its IT strategy over the past 18 months to provide modernized systems.
“We lacked a coherent strategy. We lacked the right processes and procedures,” he said. “For the past 18 months, we have been going through an incredible transformation. … Now we need to get on with it, which is what we aim to do.”
Thomas also agreed with GAO that current IT spending is “out of kilter from industry” and that VA needs to be able to spend fewer dollars toward maintenance of its systems and more toward new systems.
SAN FRANCISCO—While the VA performs well overall on key 30-day readmission rates, a study by researchers at the San Francisco VAMC questioned the utility of the measures for most of the health system’s hospitals. The... View Article
WASHINGTON—Concern over the rate of veteran suicides reached a fever pitch last month after three veterans took their lives at VA facilities over a span of five days. Two of the deaths occurred in Georgia—one... View Article