Advertisement
Departments | Specialty Focus | Non-Clinical Topics | News | Special Issues | e-Newsletter | Education | Archive | Site Search

There are two kinds of fools: those who can't change their opinions and those who won't

Acupuncture has been around for millennia.  Because of this long history, the language and thought processes that the ancients used to understand the effects of this medical practice can seem like so much “mumbo-jumbo.”  Admittedly, I do not have a clear understanding of how some patients respond to acupuncture in the same way. As an anesthesiologist, I understand how  they respond to opioids.  As a scientist, I always prefer to have a molecular level of understanding about how a drug or therapy works. As a physician, I am experienced enough not to be paralyzed when that understanding simply is not available.

In my own practice, I routinely use volatile anesthetic (inhalational) agents, confident that I can consistently anesthetize patients with these gases for surgery.  I also am aware that the full mechanism of action for the volatile anesthetics remains a mystery, and yes, patients are occasionally harmed or even killed using these drugs.  I doubt Dr. Hall would suggest my use of volatile agents for anesthesia is “quackery.”  Certainly the effect of the volatile anesthetics, despite our incomplete understanding, is a great deal easier to objectively measure than the effects of acupuncture.  From my perspective, the difficulties in objectively evaluating acupuncture are less an indictment of the practice as of medical science’s inability to explicate its effects on the human body.  So many conventional paradigms of medicine, accepted as truth by the so-called non-quack medical establishment, have ended up in the dustbin of history, while acupuncture marches on.  Blood-letting for evil humors, craniology, electromagnetic coils, radioactive water, no hand-washing. Need I continue? 

If medical history tells us anything, it is that the medicine we practice today as the “standard,” will not be the standard tomorrow.  The medical peers of our not-too-distant future will likely look back upon us with a wry smile and shake of the head as they try to fathom our lack of comprehension.  I do not understand how acupuncture works for some patients, but it works for many — and has for thousands of years — while so many other “standards” of care have been banished.  I, for one, applaud the military for demonstrating the leadership and courage to try something other than traditional opioids to improve upon the available tools for pain management of our patients.  For now, that is enough, until medicine matures sufficiently to understand how volatile anesthetics and acupuncture work.

Back to October Articles


Comments (2)

James Rittelmayer
Said this on 10-15-2012 At 12:04 pm
The CDC reports 37,485 deaths in the US in 2009 from drugs, more than automobile accidents. In 2010 there were 2,710 deaths in Florida alone from outpatient prescription drugs. I continue to be amazed at the number of veterans I see who are on chronic narcotics for pain, many of them with no identifiable abnormalities on exam or imaging. Where is the quackery and harm?
Cardiac surgeons are performing transmyocardial revascularization(TMR), laser holes through the left ventricle. We have no idea how it works but in randomized controlled clinical trials it relieves angina when bypass is not possible.
Said this on 10-15-2012 At 11:48 am
Well stated and appreciated. Straight forward and commonsense...
Post a Comment (showhide)
* Your Name:
* Your Email:
(not publicly displayed)
Reply Notification:
Approval Notification:
Website:
* Security Image:
Security Image Generate new
Copy the numbers and letters from the security image:
* Message:

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement