Clinical Topics

Is Prandial Insulin or Noninsulin Agent Better for T2D Treatment Intensification?

by Brenda Mooney

December 19, 2018

Some veterans with type 2 diabetes patients can’t reach their hemoglobin A1c goal despite using metformin, basal insulin and a sulfonylurea. What should come next?

A study in Diabetes Spectrum provided a possible answer to that question. It pointed out, however, that, despite advances in the management of patients with type 2 diabetes, data on the optimal way to intensify treatment is lacking.1

Researchers conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study of U.S. veterans receiving metformin, basal insulin, and a sulfonylurea who were started either on a third noninsulin agent or prandial insulin. The study team was from the Departments of Pharmacy at the Lebanon, PA, VAMC and Mount Sinai Hospital in New York.

Defined as the primary outcome for the study was change in A1c at 6 months after treatment intensification, while change in weight at 6 months, change in A1c at 1 year, percentage of patients achieving an A1C below 7.5% at 1 year, documented episodes of hypoglycemia and time to progression to prandial insulin were all considered secondary outcomes.

Of the 62 patients included in the study, 28 received prandial insulin and 34 were treated with a noninsulin agent. Results documented no significant difference in A1c change between the two treatment arms at either 6 months (-0.53 vs. -0.84%, P = 0.31) or 1 year (-0.67 vs. -0.86%, P = 0.61) after intervention.

At the same time, patients receiving noninsulin agents gained significantly less weight at 6 months (-2.09 vs. 1.99 kg, P <0.01), while also experiencing fewer annual episodes of hypoglycemia (1.0 vs. 2.6, P = 0.01).

“These results highlight that, in select patients, noninsulin therapies can be added to a backbone of metformin, basal insulin, and a sulfonylurea with similar A1C reductions but improved metabolic parameters relative to intensive insulin therapy,” study authors concluded.

Researchers also reported that patients receiving a specific noninsulin agents, a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist, were found to be more likely to have an A1C of less than 7.5% at 1 year, as compared to patients receiving a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor — 50 vs. 13%, P = 0.05.

Those findings were in line with a study published earlier this year in the journal Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism. Canadian researchers found that “GLP‐1 agonists yield greater reduction in HbA1c and weight as compared to DPP‐4 inhibitors, with increased incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms but not hypoglycemia. Replacing a DPP‐4 inhibitor with GLP‐1 agonist provides additional benefits in glycemic control and weight loss.”

1. Santeusanio AD, Bowen MM. Short-Term Outcomes for Veterans Receiving Basal Insulin, Metformin, and a Sulfonylurea Who Are Started on a Third Noninsulin Agent Versus Prandial Insulin. Diabetes Spectr. 2018 Aug;31(3):261-266. doi: 10.2337/ds17-0068. PubMed PMID: 30140142; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6092894.

2. Tran S, Retnakaran R, Zinman B, Kramer CK. Efficacy of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists compared to dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors for the management of type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Feb;20 Suppl 1:68-76. doi: 10.1111/dom.13137. Review.PubMed PMID: 29364587.


Comments are closed here.


Related Articles

Decompensated Diabetes More Common in Certain Racial, Age Groups

ATLANTA—Which diabetes patients are most likely to have decompensated diabetes, defined as diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state? A study published in Cureus sought to determine that across age, gender and racial groups of hospitalized... View Article

Tight Glycemic Control Increases Fracture Risk in Veterans with Diabetes

DURHAM, NC — Diabetes mellitus among older men has been associated with increased bone mineral density but paradoxically increased fracture risk, according to a study in the Journal of Bone and Mineral Research.1 The mechanisms... View Article


U.S. Medicine Recommends


More From diabetes

Diabetes

Decompensated Diabetes More Common in Certain Racial, Age Groups

ATLANTA—Which diabetes patients are most likely to have decompensated diabetes, defined as diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state? A study published in Cureus sought to determine that across age, gender and racial groups of hospitalized... View Article

Diabetes

Tight Glycemic Control Increases Fracture Risk in Veterans with Diabetes

DURHAM, NC — Diabetes mellitus among older men has been associated with increased bone mineral density but paradoxically increased fracture risk, according to a study in the Journal of Bone and Mineral Research.1 The mechanisms... View Article

Diabetes

Metformin Reduces Dementia Risk in Black Veterans With T2D

ST. LOUIS—Use of metformin for Type 2 diabetes significantly reduces the risk of dementia among African American male veterans older than 50, according to a large observational cohort study. The study published in the Annals... View Article

Diabetes

Metformin Halves All-Cause Mortality in Frail Older Veterans

Other Important VA Studies at the American Diabetes Association 79th Scientific Sessions MIAMI—The first-line drug of choice for Type 2 diabetes, metformin has long been known to effectively reduce blood glucose levels and substantially cut... View Article

Diabetes

Greatest VA Weight Gains in Women Veterans Without Diabetes

ATLANTA—How does a diagnosis of diabetes affect weight management among U.S. veterans? A study in the journal Obesity (Silver Spring) sought to assess weight trends and diabetes prevalence among U.S. veterans.1 Atlanta VAMC researchers and... View Article

Subscribe to U.S. Medicine Print Magazine

U.S. Medicine is mailed free each month to physicians, pharmacists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants and administrators working for Veterans Affairs, Department of Defense and U.S. Public Health Service.

Subscribe Now

Receive Our Email Newsletter

Stay informed about federal medical news, clinical updates and reports on government topics for the federal healthcare professional.

Sign Up