<--GAT-->

Agent Orange Exposure Doesn’t Reduce CLL Survival

by U.S. Medicine

December 15, 2017

MINNEAPOLIS—Exposure to Agent Orange was not associated with either poor prognostic factors or shortened overall survival in a large veteran population with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), even though it is associated with development of the disease, according to a study in the journal Leukemia & Lymphoma.1

Researchers from the Minneapolis VAMC and colleagues performed a retrospective study of 2,052 Vietnam veterans identified in the National VA Tumor Registry to assess the impact of Agent Orange exposure on CLL prognosis, treatment and survival.

Results indicated that prognostic factors did not differ based on exposure. The study found that veterans exposed to Agent Orange were diagnosed younger—63.2 vs. 70.5 years—and had longer overall survival (median not reached vs. 91 months).

Study authors noted that the prolonged survival was in the subgroups of patients aged 60-69 years and those with 11q deletion.

“In addition, those exposed to AO were more likely to be treated with fludarabine, chlorambucil and rituximab (38 vs. 21%, p < .001) and bendamustine plus rituximab (25 vs. 18%, p = 0.039) as first-line therapy,” the researchers wrote.

Mescher C, Gilbertson D, Randall NM, Tarchand et. al. The impact of Agent Orange exposure on prognosis and management in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a National Veteran Affairs Tumor Registry Study. Leuk Lymphoma. 2017 Sep 14:1-8. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2017.1375109. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 28905668.


Comments are closed here.


Related Articles

Better Survival for NSCLC Patients Treated by Military Medicine

Does universal healthcare access provided by the MHS translate into improved patient outcomes for non-small cell lung cancer?

Veterans Study Calls for Better Guidance on Lung Cancer Treatment

With increased imaging now detecting lung cancer nodules in sicker patients, a new report suggested that guidelines should be more directive in how to maximize benefit and minimize harm, while taking into account comorbidities and life expectancy.


U.S. Medicine Recommends


More From oncology

Oncology

Better Survival for NSCLC Patients Treated by Military Medicine

Does universal healthcare access provided by the MHS translate into improved patient outcomes for non-small cell lung cancer?

Oncology

Veterans Study Calls for Better Guidance on Lung Cancer Treatment

With increased imaging now detecting lung cancer nodules in sicker patients, a new report suggested that guidelines should be more directive in how to maximize benefit and minimize harm, while taking into account comorbidities and life expectancy.

Oncology

VA/National Cancer Institute Partnership Increases Veteran Access to Trials

Thanks to a new partnership between the National Cancer Institute and the VA, veterans with cancer will now have greater access to potentially lifesaving clinical trials.

Oncology

VA Continues Hepatocellular Screening, but Study Questions the Value

Although a recent study determined that screening veterans with cirrhosis for hepatocellular carcinoma did not reduce the risk of death associated with liver cancer, the VA has no plans to change its screening practices.

Oncology

Testosterone Therapy Not Linked to Aggressive Prostate Cancer in Veterans

Clinicians prescribing supplemental testosterone in men with low levels always have a nagging concern about the possible link between increasing hormone levels and prostate cancer.

Subscribe to U.S. Medicine Print Magazine

U.S. Medicine is mailed free each month to physicians, pharmacists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants and administrators working for Veterans Affairs, Department of Defense and U.S. Public Health Service.

Subscribe Now

Receive Our Email Newsletter

Stay informed about federal medical news, clinical updates and reports on government topics for the federal healthcare professional.

Sign Up