<--GAT-->
Clinical Topics

Side-effects Differ Between Radiation Therapies for Prostate Cancer

by U.S. Medicine

September 9, 2018

NASHVILLE, TN—A recent study compared patient-reported disease-specific functional outcomes after external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and EBRT combined with low-dose-rate brachytherapy prostate boost (EB-LDR) among men with localized prostate cancer.

With results published in the International Journal of Radiology, Oncology, Biology & Physics, the prospective, population-based Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Surgery and Radiation study enrolled men with localized prostate cancer in 2011 to 2012.1

A study team led by Vanderbilt University Medical School researchers and including participation from the Nashville VAMC used the 26-item Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite to measure patient-reported disease-specific function at baseline and at 6, 12 and 36 months. In that measure, higher domain scores indicate better function.

The trial defined minimal clinically important difference as 6 for urinary incontinence, 5 for urinary irritative function, 4 for bowel function, 12 for sexual function and 4 for hormonal function.

Overall, 578 men received EBRT and 109 received EB-LDR. Among participants, median patient age was 69 years, and 70% had intermediate- or high-risk disease. Although men in the EB-LDR group were younger (and less likely to receive androgen deprivation therapy, baseline urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal function was similar between treatment groups, study authors reported.

Results indicated that, on multivariable analyses, men receiving EB-LDR reported worse urinary irritative function at six months (adjusted mean difference [AMD] -14.4, P <0.001), 12 months (AMD -12.9, P<0.001) and 36 months (AMD -4.7, P = 0.034) than men receiving EBRT.

In addition, at 12 months, men receiving EB-LDR reported worse bowel function (AMD -5.8, P = 0.002), but those differences were not documented at 36 months. No significant differences in sexual or hormone function were detected between the treatment groups, however.

“Men treated with EB-LDR report worse bowel function at one year and worse urinary irritative function through three years compared with men treated with EBRT alone,” study authors concluded. “These side effect profiles should be discussed with patients when considering EB-LDR versus EBRT treatment.”

1. Lee DJ, Barocas DA, Zhao Z, Huang LC, et. Al. Comparison of Patient-reported Outcomes After External Beam Radiation Therapy and Combined External Beam With Low-dose-rate Brachytherapy Boost in Men With Localized Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Sep 1;102(1):116-126. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.05.043. Epub 2018 Jun 1. PubMed PMID: 30102188.


Comments are closed here.


Related Articles

VAMCs Usually as Good or Better Than Private Hospitals in Same Communities

Veterans are being given more options for obtaining care outside of the VA healthcare system. The question raised in new research is whether doing so improves care.

Report Could Add 23 Presumptive Conditions for Gulf War Veterans

A new report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine found that sufficient evidence supported an association between exposure to seven factors and detrimental reproductive effects in men or women who served in the Gulf War or developmental effects in their children.


U.S. Medicine Recommends


More From oncology

Oncology

Melanomas Associated With Internal Malignancy Risk

Genetic and environmental risk factors have been associated with the development of multiple primary melanomas (MPM) but a new study questioned whether those patients might have increased predisposition to developing internal malignancies.

Oncology

Some RCC Risk Factors Can Be Modified

Obesity, hypertension and smoking are the three modifiable risk factors that could aggressively be targeted to reduce renal cell carcinoma, according to a new study.

Oncology

Better Survival for NSCLC Patients Treated by Military Medicine

Does universal healthcare access provided by the MHS translate into improved patient outcomes for non-small cell lung cancer?

Oncology

Veterans Study Calls for Better Guidance on Lung Cancer Treatment

With increased imaging now detecting lung cancer nodules in sicker patients, a new report suggested that guidelines should be more directive in how to maximize benefit and minimize harm, while taking into account comorbidities and life expectancy.

Oncology

VA/National Cancer Institute Partnership Increases Veteran Access to Trials

Thanks to a new partnership between the National Cancer Institute and the VA, veterans with cancer will now have greater access to potentially lifesaving clinical trials.

Subscribe to U.S. Medicine Print Magazine

U.S. Medicine is mailed free each month to physicians, pharmacists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants and administrators working for Veterans Affairs, Department of Defense and U.S. Public Health Service.

Subscribe Now

Receive Our Email Newsletter

Stay informed about federal medical news, clinical updates and reports on government topics for the federal healthcare professional.

Sign Up