Advertisement
Departments | Specialty Focus | Non-Clinical Topics | News | Special Issues | e-Newsletter | Education | Archive | Site Search

VA Seeks to Increase Flu Vaccine Rates for Healthcare Staff after Last Year's Drop

By Annette M. Boyle

After recorded seasonal influenza vaccination rates among VHA healthcare personnel plummeted 21% last year compared with 2009-2010, the agency has set an aggressive goal of vaccinating 85% of healthcare workers during the 2011-2012 flu season.

A VA employee receives his flu shot at the Tennessee Valley Healthcare System. Photo from VA website.

“Obtaining the seasonal flu vaccine each year is one of the most important interventions VA healthcare workers can take to protect the health of their patients, their colleagues, themselves and their families,” said Richard Martinello, MD, chief consultant, VA Clinical Public Health. “While we have a number of initiatives designed to improve and protect our healthcare workers, the annual flu vaccine is right at the top.”

*****************

pencil_white.jpgOpinion poll:
Should VA mandate that all medical staff receive annual influenza vaccines as a condition of employment?

Please click here to participate in this month’s U.S. Medicine readership poll.

*****************

Healthcare workers are at especially high risk for influenza infection. According to a report coauthored by Martinello and three other members of the VHA Office of Public Health that appeared in the September 2011 issue of Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 50% of the H1N1 influenza infection among healthcare workers in the first wave of the 2009 pandemic was acquired in the workplace.

While surveys indicate that many healthcare workers consider general infection-control methods and good health to be largely protective against flu, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that 5% to 20% of all unimmunized individuals will develop influenza in any year. Healthcare workers’ high degree of exposure increases their likelihood of contracting the infection, making tracking sick days among healthcare personnel a leading indicator of influenza severity.

VA Population Vulnerable

For the vulnerable populations served by the VA, exposure to unimmunized and infected clinical staff poses great risk, particularly as infected workers can spread influenza for at least a full day before symptoms appear and for five to 10 days afterward. This risk is compounded by the reluctance of many physicians and nurses to take sick leave, even when they are suffering from influenza-like illnesses, and by the significant proportion — up to 50% — that experience asymptomatic influenza infection. In one study among healthcare workers, of the 23% with serologic evidence of infection, nearly 60% had no recollection of having had influenza, and almost 30% did not recall having any respiratory infection.

Many studies have shown a positive correlation between high rates of healthcare personnel influenza vaccination rates and lower proportions of nosocomial cases among hospitalized patients. Minimizing the spread of influenza to VA patients is critical to their health. Among the highest-risk patients, those with spinal-cord injury or disorders have a 37% higher likelihood of death from influenza than the general population. Half of patients with underlying cardiovascular disorders who contract influenza will develop pneumonia, and 10% will die. Among longterm-care personnel, a study in the British Medical Journal demonstrated that benefit associated with influenza vaccinations of 100 healthcare workers is equivalent to saving five lives, eliminating two hospital admissions and seven office visits, and keeping nine individuals from developing influenza-like illness.

Based on figures obtained from the Occupational Health Record-keeping System (OHRS), an electronic medical record system, only 54% of VHA healthcare workers received the flu vaccine last year, down from 77% who reported they had been vaccinated when surveyed in 2009-2010. In 2009, VA physicians reported the highest rates of vaccination at 88.7%, while nursing assistants and licensed practical nurses had rates of approximately 71%. Healthcare aides and HCWs under the age of 50 typically have the lowest rates of vaccination, according to the CDC.

“Changes in reporting procedures account for some of the drop in vaccination rates, but there is still quite a gap compared to previous years,” Martinello said.

“Flu fatigue” following the intense effort to vaccinate veterans and healthcare personnel during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic may have contributed to the lower vaccination rates reported in 2010, suggested Kristin Nichol, MD, MPH, MBA, associate chief of staff for research, in her introduction to the VA Influenza Manual 2011-2012.


Comments (4)

Thomas, Robert, MD, MPH&TM
Said this on 3-8-2012 At 05:47 pm
Although many well-meaning people might respond in an enthusiastic sociopolitically correct manner, a scientific approach is necessary when dealing wiith patients and care-givers. Injectable immunizations are not completely benign. An appropriate risk-benefit appraisal has to be made in relation to herd immunity for the intended population before generalizations start to determine health policy.
Said this on 3-6-2012 At 01:42 pm
Flu Immunization should be mandatory for VA employees and volunteers. Those who care for veterans do not have the right to put them in danger. The benefits of immunization far outweigh the risks. The VA cares for many vulnerable people, some of whom are too ill to be vaccinated, some for whom the vaccine may not be effective. The VA has a duty to protect them from the preventable exposure to potentially dangerous or fatal illness. The flu can kill healthy people and the vulnerable, and the VA has a duty to protect them; patients, co-workers, and volunteers. There is no perfect or risk free course of action, but there is no better choice for the VA than mandatory immunizations.
Marzolf,James MD MPH
Said this on 3-6-2012 At 12:21 pm
I am puzzled by the 85-90% goal and have looked for the empirical basis for it but have yet to find it.

Recent meta-analyses indicates that there is no evidence that vaccinating HCWs prevents influenza in elderly residents in LTCFs, no guidance regarding the safety, efficacy or effectiveness of influenza vaccines for people aged 65 years or older, and that vaccine use did not affect the number of people hospitalized or working days lost but caused one case of Guillian‐Barré syndrome for every one million vaccinations.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH001094...
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20166073
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20166072

In summary, the Cochrane analyses found “most studies flawed. Studies were not randomized, had difficulty in analyzing trial conditions, had no controls, and there was confusion between influenza and influenza-like infections, which can result in an over-estimation of the true impact of the illness and flu deaths. In addition, not enough studies were done on the safety of vaccines.”

http://jama.ama-assn.org/content/296/16/1990.short

Here’s a good example of the shabby research the meta-analysis is talking about. It was funded by CDC and conducted by Kaiser Permanente. It was a nonrandomized analysis of the records of babies 6 to 23 months old who were given flu shots plus other vaccines between 1991 and 2003. No unvaccinated controls were used. “The study used only the cases of those who had seen the doctor within 14 days of receiving the flu vaccination. These criteria eliminated dozens of cases of adverse effects, including convulsions and brain injury. Some of the cases of convulsions and Guillain-Barre syndrome were attributed to other vaccines or coincidence. Of the 19 investigators, nine had financial ties to vaccine manufacturers.” Whew!!!

Add to that the October 2011 study published in Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology which indicated that there was no demonstrable increase in efficacy above 75% employee vaccination levels in terms of preventing laboratory confirmed influenza cases and I’d have to say it’s not a very compelling argument for mandatory vaccination of employees if we are already hitting 75%. However, mandating it is a sure litigation multiplier.
Florence Dyer,NP
Said this on 3-5-2012 At 05:07 pm
Although I encourage everyone to get all their immunizations, I do not support the mandatory Flu vaccinatino for health care workers because:
-The Fly vaccine is only 60 % effective. Those that are immunized against the Flu can still have and spread the Flu 40% of the time and they may have a false sense of security and not follow regular prevention habits such has: cover your cough, wash your hands, stay home when sick.
-The Flu vaccines does have potential serious health risk.
-Once it is a go for one vaccine, the door is opened for mandatory "anything";What will be the next mandatory substance to be imposed? This is simply too much control on people lives and body.
-If the vaccine is 95 to 100% effective, health workers will probably take it spontaneously.
- Health workers are not the only factor in patients getting exposed to Flu: their visitors, their family also can give them the Flu.
Post a Comment
* Your Name:
* Your Email:
(not publicly displayed)
Reply Notification:
Approval Notification:
Website:
* Security Image:
Security Image Generate new
Copy the numbers and letters from the security image:
* Message:

Email to Friend

Fill in the form below to send this infectious disease to a friend:

Email to Friend
* Your Name:
* Your Email:
* Friend's Name:
* Friend's Email:
* Security Image:
Security Image Generate new
Copy the numbers and letters from the security image
* Message:

Advertisement
Advertisement