Non-Clinical Topics

Legislation: Clinicians Must Be Involved in Formulary Design, Purchasing

by Sandra Basu

May 13, 2018
VA’s Consolidated Mail Outpatient Pharmacy (CMOP) in Charleston, SC. New legislation is seeking to increase clinician input into formulary decisionmaking.

WASHINGTON — Legislation to prevent VA from outsourcing creation of its supplies formulary and to require more input from medical professions is being considered in Congress.

The bipartisan bill was introduced by House Committee on Veterans Affairs Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations Chairman Jack Bergman (R-MI) and fellow committee members Reps. Scott Peters (D-CA), Jim Banks (R-IN) and Neal Dunn (R-FL).

In addition to preventing VA from outsourcing the creation of its formulary, it would require the agency to have medical professionals with relevant expertise making formulary decisions and conducting formulary analyses, instead of administrative staff.

The bill also requires that VA provide the Senate and House Committees on Veterans’ Affairs a list of each employee making formulary decisions with information about relevant medical expertise.

A bill description explained that “doctors and nurses are directly accountable for the quality of health care they provide to veterans and have the best knowledge of the instruments and supplies they use.”

“Unfortunately, the system for purchasing medical and surgical supplies has gone off track because unqualified administrators were deciding which products physicians get to use. Our legislation will put medical experts back in charge and prevent the VA from making the same mistakes again,” Bergman pointed out.

The bill description explained that “VA is now struggling to fix the medical- surgical formulary and administer the [Medical/Surgical Prime Vendor (MSPV) program] at the same time.”

“This legislation would direct VA to fix its medical-surgical formulary and ensures that qualified medical professionals make formulary decisions,” it stated.

GAO Report

The bill was in response to a Government Accountability Office (GAO) report last year which cited problems with VA’s new method of purchasing medical and supplies, implemented in late 2016. The program, known as the Medical Surgical Prime Vender-Next Generation (MSPV-NG), was designed to replace its legacy program.

Among the problems cited was that, while the new program was designed to streamline the purchasing of medical devices at the VA, as of June 2017, only about a third of the items on the initial version of the formulary “were being ordered in any significant quantity by medical centers, indicating that many items on the formulary were not those that are needed by medical centers.”

One of the problems found by GAO was that VA did not have enough clinician input into its formulary but relied on data from previous clinician purchases to determine the initial formulary.

“The MSPV-NG program office initially developed requirements for items to be included in the formulary based almost exclusively on prior supply purchases, with limited clinician involvement,” the report explained.

VA had determined that this “would be a good representation of medical centers’ needs and that clinician input would not be required for identifying which items to include in the initial formulary,” according to report authors.

GAO noted, however, that using purchase data to develop the formulary rather than clinician input “stood in sharp contrast to those of the leading hospital networks we met with, which rely heavily on clinician input.”

The report pointed out that VA made some changes in the second phase of requirements development by increasing the level of clinical involvement but “has not yet achieved its goals for utilization and cost avoidance.”

At a hearing in December, VHA Acting Chief Procurement and Logistics Officer Ricky Lemmon acknowledged that VA needed to make its medical and surgical product formulary more robust.

While Lemmon said that “hospitals have ways to get the products they need,” he conceded that VA needed to “make it easier for them to get the products and assure taxpayers are getting good value.”

He explained in his testimony that “VHA has decided to move forward with modifying the current contracts or developing replacement contracts to rectify the issues identified in the GAO audit.”

Comments are closed here.

Related Articles

Combat, Not Deployment, Appears to Increase Risk of New-Onset Asthma

BETHESDA, MD—Many reports have suggested that servicemembers who deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan developed respiratory illnesses at higher-than-expected rates, but study results looking at increased rates of asthma have been mixed. A new study by... View Article

VA Continues Efforts to Reduce Drug Diversion; Focuses on Opiates

WASHINGTON—In the past two years, the VA has implemented a nine-step process to minimize drug diversion, but cases continue to slip through. In December 2018, the VA’s Office of the Inspector General reported two instances... View Article

U.S. Medicine Recommends

More From legislation


Executive Order Creates Task Force to Combat Veteran Suicide

LOS ANGELES—For nearly half of the patients with localized advanced prostate cancer, radiation therapy is the primary intervention and standard of care for recurrent disease following surgery. The problem is that nearly 30% to 50%... View Article


Legislators Express Outrage Over Military Sexual Trauma Issues Subhead: Senator Describes Her Experience as Air Force Rape Victim

LOS ANGELES—For nearly half of the patients with localized advanced prostate cancer, radiation therapy is the primary intervention and standard of care for recurrent disease following surgery. The problem is that nearly 30% to 50%... View Article


Senate Votes Overwhelmingly to Make Robert L. Wilkie the New VA Secretary

Robert L. Wilkie took office as the 10th VA Secretary after the U.S. Senate voted 86-9 to confirm him.


VA secretary nominee promises opposition to healthcare privatization

VA Secretary nominee Robert L. Wilkie promised lawmakers he would not privatize VA healthcare if he is confirmed.


House subcommittee pushes for burn pit exposure answers

The VA and its partners are pursuing research, including six major studies, to better understand the potential health effects of burn pit exposures.

Subscribe to U.S. Medicine Print Magazine

U.S. Medicine is mailed free each month to physicians, pharmacists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants and administrators working for Veterans Affairs, Department of Defense and U.S. Public Health Service.

Subscribe Now

Receive Our Email Newsletter

Stay informed about federal medical news, clinical updates and reports on government topics for the federal healthcare professional.

Sign Up