<--GAT-->
Non-Clinical Topics

Lawmakers Continue to Push VA to Meet Benefits Modernization Deadline

by Sandra Basu

September 13, 2018
Earlier this year, the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee (SVAC) minority staff met with Paul Lawrence, PhD, of the VBA. (Veterans Benefits Administration photo)

WASHINGTON—VA remains on track for implementing its new disability appeals system by the February 2019 deadline, VA officials told lawmakers at a recent hearing.

“We have a strong team in place with a well-thought-out plan for implementation and beyond,” explained said Paul Lawrence, the VA’s undersecretary for benefits.

Lawrence made his comments at a hearing where lawmakers questioned whether VA would make the deadline to implement appeals reform passed in the Veterans Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act of 2017. The law is designed to give veterans more options to have their claims appeals reviewed and to speed up the handling of their claims.

It was the second hearing held this year on the subject by the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs. Chairman Phil Roe, MD, (R-TN) said his committee will “hold as many hearing as we need to ensure that VA effectively implements the law.”

“After hearing horror stories of veterans who had been waiting five, six years or even longer for a final decision on their claims, The Veterans Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act of 2017 gave veterans hope that a modern appeals system could improve appeals processing,” he said.

Roe also said that VA needs to understand that the committee “not only expects the department to successfully roll out the new appeals system, but to also reduce the current appeals backlog.

“Right now, VA has a backlog of almost 430,000 pending appeals—with many veterans waiting six years or longer just for a final decision on their claim for benefits. That is unacceptable,” he pointed out.

Lawrence, who heads the Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA), told lawmakers that the agency is learning from its Rapid Appeals Modernization Program (RAMP), a pilot program authorized by law to test the system. Under that pilot, veterans are given the option of choosing between the two new lanes.

At the previous hearing this year, lawmakers were lamenting that only about 3% of invited veterans had chosen to participate in the pilot. That has since increased to more than 13%, according to Lawrence, who emphasized that more than 31,000 veterans had opted to use RAMP, as of July.

“VA is processing RAMP claims in an average of 84, days well below the average processing goal of 125 days. RAMP is providing valuable insights into staff composition, workload management, successful methods of outreach and identification of quality errors,” he added.

Lawmakers expressed concern that participation in the pilot program is not higher.

“The RAMP program is crucial to successful implementation of the appeals process by giving you and us information and feedback about how it is proceeding, but we are all concerned that we only have a 13% intake based on the outreach,” Rep. Elizabeth Etsy (D-CT) noted.

Increasing Awareness

Lawrence responded that VA is striving to increase awareness about RAMP and is communicating to veterans’ service organizations about RAMP’s speed of processing and grant rate so that those groups can share that information with veterans as an option.

“I think broadly [participation] began low and, had it stayed low, that would have been a real knock on VBA, but the fact that we began to think about why this was and take more outreach steps and communicate more … I am very positive about what RAMP is going to give us,” he said.

Also testifying was Elizabeth Curda, director the Government Accountability Office (GAO)’s Education, Workforce and Income Security team. She updated lawmakers on GAO’s assessment of VA’s implementation plans.

GAO issued a report earlier this year finding that VA’s appeals implementation plan needed improvement and did not provide complete information. Since then, Curda said that VA has taken some actions on elements that were not fully addressed but noted, that until VA’s appeals plan provides complete information on all required elements, Congress may not have the information needed to conduct oversight of the agency’s efforts.

For example, GAO found that VA has not established complete and balanced goals and measures or developed a plan for comparing the new and legacy processes.

“Without fully addressing our recommendations, the plan continues to have shortcomings, such as that we cannot be certain that implementation will go smoothly or that VA will know if the system is performing any better than the system it is replacing,” Curda said.

Rep. Julia Brownley (D-CA) and other lawmakers expressed concerns that GAO found that performance measures and goals were lacking for the implementation plan.

“It seems to me that we are sort of putting the cart before the horse here,” Brownley said of VA’s efforts.

VBA Appeals Management Office Director David McLenachen assured lawmakers that their next progress update was due in August and would have additional details that would address GAO’s concerns.


Related Articles

“Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress. Working together is success.” — Henry Ford (1863-1947)

October is Operation Bushmaster season for Uniformed Services University (USU) medical and nursing students.

NASA Partners with Academia for CVD Prediction Tool in Younger Adults

Federal medicine played a crucial role in the development of a new online tool to better predict which middle-aged adults are at the greatest risk of having acute myocardial infarction or stroke over the next decade.


U.S. Medicine Recommends


More From news

News

Suicide Rates Jump Up for Younger Veterans in Recent Years

Rates of suicide among younger veterans (ages 18-34) “increased substantially in recent years,” climbing from 40.4 suicide deaths per 100,000 population in 2015 to 45 suicide deaths per 100,000 population in 2016, according to a new report.

News

Two-Thirds of VAMCs Improved Quality, Efficiency in Recent Assessment

More than half of 15 VAMCs classified as “high risk” in the October 2017 Strategic Analytics for Improvement and Learning report moved out of that category in the most recent update. But one, the DCVAMC in Washington declined and is now considered “critical.”

News

VHA Accountability Unclear for Assuring Medical Equipment Sterility

Who is responsible for VHA's sterile processing reusable medical equipment is unclear, and the lack of accountability needs to be addressed, agency officials told lawmakers.

News

House Passes Bill to Improve Hiring, Retention at VHA

A three-year pilot program to provide undergraduate students a clinical observation experience within VA is called for in a bill recently passed by the House of Representatives.

News

Legislators Question Governance of VA EHR Implementation

How much will implementation and integration of a new electronic health record slow down processes at the VA, which already struggles with delays in care?

Facebook Comment

Subscribe to U.S. Medicine Print Magazine

U.S. Medicine is mailed free each month to physicians, pharmacists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants and administrators working for Veterans Affairs, Department of Defense and U.S. Public Health Service.

Subscribe Now

Receive Our Email Newsletter

Stay informed about federal medical news, clinical updates and reports on government topics for the federal healthcare professional.

Sign Up