Advertisement
Departments | Specialty Focus | Non-Clinical Topics | News | Special Issues | e-Newsletter | Education | Archive | Site Search

Congress Asks: In Wake of Court Ruling, Should VA Do More to Push Troubled Veterans Into Treatment?

iStock_000004741362Small.jpg

WASHINGTON — Does VA need to employ more aggressive tactics when it comes to getting veterans struggling with PTSD, depression and s

ubstance abuse into treatment?  Should some of those tactics involve using disability benefits as an incentive to receive treatment instead of as a simple entitlement?

These are a few of the many questions that have arisen in the wake of the California court decision that ruled VA’s delay in getting mental health care and benefits to veterans is a violation of due process under their 5th Amendment rights.

The idea of coercing veterans into care is controversial and runs up against both political and ethical objections. However, veterans’ advocates, VA advisors, and many veterans agree that, when it comes to getting veterans mental health care, VA’s position should not be as passive as it has been.

More Aggressive Care

“Though the VA were there and they were supportive, they never said, ‘this is what’s going to happen if you don’t get any help,’” veteran Daniel Hanson told legislators last month at a House VA Committee hearing. “VA needs to be more assertive in their treatment of veterans. They need to say, ‘It’s time to get help, or find somewhere else to get help.’”

Hanson has told his story to Congress before — the first time at a Senate hearing in March 2010. In February 2004, Hanson was deployed with the 2nd Battalion, 4th Marines to Ar-Ramadi, Iraq. His first experience with death on that tour was a fellow marine shooting himself in the head. By October 2004, 34 more marines in his battalion suffered combat-related deaths.

“I started drinking pretty heavily [after that tour],” Hanson said. “I was dealing with things I wasn’t prepared to deal with.”

By the time Hanson returned from his second tour — this one to Okinawa, Japan — he was drinking regularly, getting into fights and battling depression. In January 2007, he left the Marine Corps. By that time, the deaths of fellow marines — either in combat for those still in Iraq or by suicide at home — was a regular part of his life. In March 2007, his brother Travis, also a marine, hanged himself in the basement of his home.

Hanson began working with the St. Cloud VAMC in Minnesota on an outpatient basis. During that time, his marriage disintegrated and he was racking up a string of DUIs, spending some time in jail. At St. Cloud, he went through the Dual Diagnosis Program for PTSD and alcohol abuse. However, Hanson said, while the program taught patients about the dangers of drugs and alcohol, it had little real-life application. Eventually, he tried to kill himself by swallowing pills, resulting in a 72-hour suicide watch at St. Cloud.

Following that suicide attempt, there was little contact from VA, Hanson said, and he went back to his life, still abusing alcohol. While in jail for another DUI, he found a flyer for Minnesota Teen Challenge (MNTC) — a 13- to 15-month faith-based treatment and recovery program.

Hanson entered the yearlong program. He visited VA once a week for military-specific mental health issues, then returned to MNTC where, he said, he received the kind of discipline that was lacking at VA. That treatment came at a cost, though — about $10,000 a year, which VA would not help fund, because MNTC was not an approved VA partner.

Remarried with children, Hanson now acts as a liaison for MNTC, telling his story to other veterans and how the program helped him. “A big part of it was that the program wasn’t filled with people who had been through the same things I had. I didn’t have to put on this macho [act],” Hanson said. “And the structure was almost like the military. They tell you when to get up and go to bed. And if you want to get in a fight, you’re gone.”

Hanson asserted that he “could have gotten better, quicker” if the relationship that VA had fostered with him over the years had been less that of a concerned friend and more like that of an assertive parent or commanding officer.

Back to July Articles


Comments (4)

Lincy Pandithurai
Said this on 8-1-2011 At 11:09 am
veterans those who suffers from PTSD needs treatment to improve their quality of life, when the benefits given to them, 90% of them
take the money drinks and uses drugs to combat the PTSD symptoms, and choose not to get actual treatment for PTSD, they deserve compensation, but moreso actual treatment to improve their quality of life.
Veteran w/ PTSD and former VA provider
Said this on 7-28-2011 At 02:28 am

 

So I have some questions to ask before the VA goes down this slippery slope. As you are all very aware those with the "Invisible Wounds of War" are treated by many in the military and the public as weak, not having a real injury or just crazy. You now want to compound the feelings of anxiety and mistrust by forcing the veteran into treatment that may or may not help and they may or may not be ready for because we as tax payers have the right to demand that?

Also is it right to make mental illnesses the only disability that a veteran will not be rated for at the time they apply and not have any pay given until someone decides they are well or as well as they can get from the treatment provided? So taking that logic; when I had patients who do not comply with the diabetes or HTN treatments I recommended for the good of their health the checks should be withheld and they should not get a full rating ? Only when they have met A1c goals and controled Blood presure the money can be given. To bad if they and their families have nothing else to live on.

Sorry but when a person joins the military they are promised that the government/taxpayer will care for any medical disabilities incurred for being willing to do a job that could end in disability or death. They are to be paid for these disabilities, provided the very best care possible, have easy access to it if they wish to use it and not to be discriminated against because it is a mental injury/illness and not a physical on. They can be an alcoholic without a mental health problem and still get paid for their SC disabilities because he does not have PTSD. How is this fair?

As a current mental health patient with my local VA I can attest to the problem of immediate access when there is a urgent need. It can take months to get routine appointments and have continuity of care with the high turnover in providers.

I also can tell you there are not any programs that my VA advertises, refers to or strongly encourages me to participate in. I had to ask what else we could try to help me get better because I was fed up with being unable to keep jobs, go out in public, being very depressed and feeling hopeless. I was offered a one on one program with a counselor to try some of the new treatment modalities but they were not in any available times that would work for me. I finally gave up trying to do it with the VA and I am now working with the much more flexible Vet Center. I do support providers and the VA both pushing patients who need help at every encounter to get treatment just as we encourage smokers to stop.

I recommend that there is an advocate position created at each VA who calls and writes those who need treatment encouraging them to get the help they need with a list of the programs available that are open at multiple hours, inpatient or out patient. That same person should then invite the vet to come in a discuss the options and how they can make it work best for them. It should be some one who acts a coordinator for the patient to get help. This person is the one who can be seen as the personal advocate for those who are resistant to treatment because of fear of everything and a lack of trust with military/VA. It still all comes down to the patient being ready for treatment because you cannot make someone well. They alone must choose to work on getting better; while we as Americans continue to support the troops as promised.

 

VA Psych NP
Said this on 7-21-2011 At 04:34 pm

The Program of Assertive Community Treatment is an evidence-based strategy that has been employed in community mental health centers for decades. ACT utilizes a team-based approach which has been effective in engaging patients in mental health treatment; the core intervention in ACT is case management, in combination with wrap-around mental health services. It's a costly program, but  has the potential to reduce more expensive interventions, such as inpatient hospitalization.

 

The VA's Mental Health Intensive Case Management (MHICM) program has a similar model to ACT, however, this service is only available to very psychiatrically ill  patients, who have been hospitalized many times.

 

Veterans who are having trouble engaging in "traditional" psychiatric treatment (based in a medical model) but who are not sick enough to require MHICM, may benefit an intermidiate level of service that a well-implemented ACT program can provide.

 

However, without addressing the widespread access issue to mental health and substance use services, ACT programs will likely fail at the VA. Being "assertive" means that when the Veteran responds to your efforts to engage him or her in treatment, there needs to be treatment available...immediately. When the Veteran is finally ready to seek substance use or mental health treatment, it is unreasonable to expect them to wait for another several months for an appointment.

 

Assertive Community Treatment can be a successful alternative to coercive treatment. It is voluntary, ethical and evidence-based. However, the VA will need to promote a recovery-based, integrated culture of mental health treatment for this to be feasible.

 

Brian Bladykas M.D., Psychiatry
Said this on 7-27-2011 At 12:34 pm

Agree with concerns regarding access and treatment.

I generally have a Libertarian philosophy and respect the right to free choice, but, is it reasonable for the taxpayers to require some form of treatment if they are paying for someone's disability??  Not an easy question to ask, but given the realities of social resources the question is likely to be forced upon us.

Post a Comment (showhide)
* Your Name:
* Your Email:
(not publicly displayed)
Reply Notification:
Approval Notification:
Website:
* Security Image:
Security Image Generate new
Copy the numbers and letters from the security image:
* Message:

Advertisement