Servicemembers Lose Benefits after Improper Discharges for Alleged Personality Disorders

by U.S. Medicine

May 10, 2012

By Stephen Spotswood

WASHINGTON — The U.S. military continues to use improper processes to diagnose significant numbers of servicemembers with pre-existing personality disorders (PD) and then discharge them, according to government documents obtained by an advocacy group.

The Vietnam Veterans of America (VVA) cited new documents released from DoD under the Freedom of Information Act to show the problem is continuing and may be increasing. Personality disorders are considered pre-existing conditions, and servicemembers discharged with those diagnoses are ineligible for financial or medical benefits.

VVA and other veterans’ advocates have spent years advocating reform of DoD’s procedure for identifying and diagnosing PD, contending the disorder can be confused with service-connected mental-health conditions. They also maintain that improper diagnosis of PD has cut hundreds, perhaps thousands, of servicemembers off from the benefits and healthcare services they are owed.

According to a report released by VVA that breaks down information the organization obtained from DoD, the number of PD discharges may be going up, and many of those discharges are still being conducted improperly.


Recruits go on patrol during basic training at Fort Jackson, SC, earlier this year.
Even if recruits meet the physical rigors, they could be forced out of the military
because of improper diagnoses of personality disorders. Photo by Air Force Staff
Sgt. Shawn Weismiller

Wrongful Discharges

Personality disorders are a class of mental-health disorder characterized by individuals’ inflexible, socially inappropriate behaviors across diverse situations. It cannot be caused by any other major psychiatric disorder, medical disorder or substance abuse. Neither is it necessarily incompatible with military service but deemed that only when it interferes with the proper execution of a servicemember’s duties.

In 2008, after a series of reports in the media about the inappropriate use of PD discharges by DoD physicians, including allegations that the diagnoses were made to cut down on benefit costs, Congress asked DoD to establish a moratorium on  PD discharges. 

According to DoD documents, 31,000 servicemembers were separated from the military with a PD diagnosis between FY 2001 and FY 2010. Records obtained by VVA and investigations conducted by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) indicate that hundreds of these discharges were done in violation of DoD instructions establishing protections against wrongful discharge.

According to VVA’s report, those wrongful — or at least poorly conducted — discharges are continuing. One Navy report on 2008-2009 PD discharges states only that only 8.9% of PD discharges were properly processed.

A 2008 GAO investigation had looked at a sample of soldiers discharged for PD and found that between 22% and 60% of those had not actually been diagnosed by a psychologist or psychiatrist as having a PD that interfered with their duties. Additionally, 60% of them never received counseling about their PD before leaving the service.

The report concluded that the military had no way of confirming that military commanders were meeting DoD separation requirements.

Servicemembers Lose Benefits after Improper Discharges for Alleged Personality Disorders Cont

Meeting Requirements

As of August 2008, a legal PD separation must meet eight requirements — five general and three specific to servicemembers who have served in a designated imminent danger pay (IDP) area. The first five are: formal counseling of a PD diagnosis and a chance to improve behavior; a diagnosis by a psychiatrist or PhD-level psychologist; a written statement from that mental-health provider that the disorder keeps the servicemember from functioning in the military; written notification to the servicemember of his or her impending separation; advising the servicemember that the diagnosis does not qualify as a disability.

The latter requirement exists because of reports from discharged servicemembers that they were told by military physicians or superior officers that the PD discharge was, in fact, a disability and would allow them to receive benefits and healthcare. The servicemember would then not protest the discharge and, only after leaving the military, would they discover they were ineligible for benefits.

The three additional IDP requirements are: evidence that PD diagnosis was corroborated by a peer psychiatrist; addressing PTSD or other mental-illness comorbidity; the endorsement of the Surgeon General of the military department concerned prior to discharge.

In FY 2008, a 0% compliance rating on some of these requirements by the different services was not unusual. By FY 2010, compliance rates had risen dramatically, with several services showing 100% compliance. As the VVA report makes a point of mentioning, however, the compliance ratings are self-reported by the services.

Substituting AD for PD

From FY 2008 to FY 2010, the number of PD discharges dropped, and PD compliance improved throughout DoD, according to the documents obtained by VVA. During that same time, however, discharges increased for adjustment disorder (AD), defined as  a response to a life stress that is out of proportion to the intensity of the event. It manifests as significant emotional or behavioral symptoms that do not meet the criteria for PTSD or anxiety disorder.

VVA has expressed concern that the services are simply substituting AD discharges for PD discharges.

The most complete data VVA received concerning AD discharges was from the Air Force. Between FY 2008 and FY 2010, PD discharges in the Air Force dropped from 840 to 77 — an 87% decrease.

During a similar time period, AD discharges in the Air Force rose from 102 in FY 2007 to 668 in FY 2010 — a 555% increase.

From FY 2008 to FY 2010, the Army routinely discharged more than 2,000 soldiers annually for AD. During those years, the number of those soldiers who had served in imminent-danger areas rose dramatically, from 346 in FY 2008 to 767 in FY 2010, when they made up 37% of all Army AD discharges.

The only other data VVA received through its FOIA request on AD discharges was from the Coast Guard, whose AD discharges rose from 57 in FY 2009 to 109 in FY 2010.

“Unlike personality-disorder discharges, adjustment-disorder procedures were neither the subject of the 2008 GAO investigation nor the centerpiece of congressional hearings that year,” the VVA report states. “To date there has been no examination of the use of AD discharges, and it is unclear whether AD has simply replaced PD as a tool for illegally separating servicemembers.”

VVA recommends DoD revise its regulations so that the requirements for meeting an AD discharge mirror the requirements for PD discharges.

Addressing The Discharged

VVA and other VSOs are concerned about the continuing practice of wrongfully discharging soldiers for personality or adjustment disorders, but they are also concerned about the thousands of servicemembers discharged improperly over the last 10 years who might be due benefits and healthcare and have been unable to receive them.

The report states several times that, to date, DoD has “taken no meaningful steps to redress the wrongful discharges of these thousands of servicemembers.”  

“Shame on the Department of Defense,” said Thomas Berger, MD, VVA executive director for the Veterans Health Council. “It acknowledges the widespread illegality of these discharges and changed its rules going forward but has left 31,000 wounded warriors alone to fend for themselves, denied even basic medical care for their injuries.”

DoD has not commented on the report.

At a recent House Veterans Affairs Committee hearing on an unrelated topic, legislators waded into the issue, asking DoD and VA officials how these discharged servicemembers can address what could have been an illegal discharge from the military.

Philip Burdette, principal director of DoD’s Wounded Warrior Care and Transition Policy admitted that, as more attention has been paid to behavioral health issues and diagnoses have skyrocketed, training of behavioral health professionals has lagged.

As for the recourse left to discharged servicemembers, Burdette said, “The ability of a servicemember to challenge and reopen these cases has not been abridged. They’ve been extended. VA has done fantastic work of making those avenues for veterans available.”

Of the VVA report, Burdette said, “I think the role of VSOs is critical. I consider them our conscience.”

VVA Report: Casting Troops Aside: The United States Military’s Illegal Personality Disorder Discharge Problem

Back to May Articles


20 Comments

  • Sgt. Austin Bell says:

    Are there groups who defend soldiers whose “command” knowingly
    and willfully commit such actions as recommending “personality discharges”
    to cause Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress?

  • Matthew says:

    If you feel there is a deeper issue such as depression/PTSD, you will have to do a lot of research on your own behalf to make the case that the discharge is unjust. This happened to me and I was eventually able to make contact with the Wounded Warrior Project, they were able to advocate for me and eventually got my admin sep overturned so I could have a Medical Evaluation Board package submitted.

  • Matthew says:

    If you feel there is a deeper issue such as depression/PTSD, you will have to do a lot of research on your own behalf to make the case that the discharge is unjust. This happened to me and I was eventually able to make contact with the Wounded Warrior Project, they were able to advocate for me and eventually got my admin sep overturned so I could have a Medical Evaluation Board package submitted.

  • Susanne says:

    actually there is. me and my husband have just submitted all the paperwork to them to hope they will take the case.
    http://www.nvlsp.org/what-we-do/lawyers-serving-warriors/ this is there website…

    I have done some researches myself the past 3-4weeks on how the BCMR changes the narrative and the REC.. You really need to be prepared and have sufficient evidence if you want to fight the PD discharge… But in most cases the BCMR will change the narrative reason to ‘secretarial authority’ which should help finding proper employment without the PD stamp on your DD214

  • Susanne says:

    actually there is. me and my husband have just submitted all the paperwork to them to hope they will take the case.
    http://www.nvlsp.org/what-we-do/lawyers-serving-warriors/ this is there website…

    I have done some researches myself the past 3-4weeks on how the BCMR changes the narrative and the REC.. You really need to be prepared and have sufficient evidence if you want to fight the PD discharge… But in most cases the BCMR will change the narrative reason to ‘secretarial authority’ which should help finding proper employment without the PD stamp on your DD214

  • Guy Gambill says:

    http://www.usjag.org/

    Forgot the URL

  • Guy Gambill says:

    You may want to check out the Uniformed Services Justice & Advocacy Group (USJAG).

  • Guy Gambill says:

    http://www.usjag.org/

    Forgot the URL

  • Eliot says:

    I received a PD discharge in 88. This hasn’t prevented employment or caused other problems.
    However, I received the remainder of my reenlistment bonus after separation.
    Mine was a way for my command to cheat me since I wouldn’t give in to the politics and bullshit to which I was subjected. I challenged another administrative discharge and they went with this. There was no shrink involved…just personnel stamps on the paperwork.
    I’m applying to the VA for benefits…do you them it will create a problem?

  • Greg A says:

    I have been dealing with this same issue for close to 20yrs, over wounds from Nam. Said what happened to me wasn’t ‘traumatic’ enough. Well the 4 months I spent in 3 different hospital was traumatic to me. Ended up calling the DC headquarters of the DAV saying that I was getting the run around from the local office. 3 days later every thing started to change, hopefully for the better. In that I never saw, talked to or knew a phys. until 3 years after I retired….

  • John Russell DeVore jr. says:

    I was and the Navy in 1975 October 19, 1975 I was beaten by for African-Americans the next day I was discharged unsuitability – duly diagnosed behavior disorder. At the time I discharge was under other then honorable conditions . It took me 10 years to finally get it upgraded to a general under honorable conditions.
    At that time they told me it was easier to discharge one white person then it was to discharge for African-Americans I was the only one punished, I was discharged on December 19, 1975.
    At the time this was the height of the immigration law where they tried to integrate whites and blacks and all of the nationalities .
    This started the worst days of my life that have never been the same since I joined the Navy to make a career out of it and it was cut short because of this incident .
    I haven’t said anything about this for a while now it’s time for me to speak up I think it was wrong but I got punished for something I didn’t do because I was white now I think it’s time to speak out.
    I was wondering if there’s anything you could do to help me to get back disability for this incident if not I think I’m taking this to the press to let him know what it was like back then in the 70s .
    Ever since then my life is been in ruins , for instance not been able to hold down a job I’m 61 years old and that still haunts me to this day .
    I would like to know if I am eligible for disability my next step is the VA advocate .
    I did not get to see a psychiatrist or psychologist they just discharge me .
    I was hoping there was someway you could advise me if not I’m getting attorney and I believe island titled to back disability pay and all of its amenities .

  • SrA Dawson says:

    Yes, there are multiple organizations out there. I had to find them myself after being retaliated against by a Maj in mental health because I requested for a different provider after she violated HIPAA, DoD regulations, & AFIs and tried to cover it up. Some of these organizations include Disposable Warriors, who Chuck Luther is the founder of. He is personal victim of being wrongfully discharge for PD in a combat zone and was tortured by our own military to sign documents stating he agreed to the discharge. He has been more beneficial to me then any other organization. There is also the CMRN and IG Rights Hotline. If you go to joshuakors.com/military there is numerous amounts of info that may be able to help you. Another list of resources can be found on his site under: joshuakors.com/list. Hope this information helps.

  • SrA Dawson says:

    Yes, there are multiple organizations out there. I had to find them myself after being retaliated against by a Maj in mental health because I requested for a different provider after she violated HIPAA, DoD regulations, & AFIs and tried to cover it up. Some of these organizations include Disposable Warriors, who Chuck Luther is the founder of. He is personal victim of being wrongfully discharge for PD in a combat zone and was tortured by our own military to sign documents stating he agreed to the discharge. He has been more beneficial to me then any other organization. There is also the CMRN and IG Rights Hotline. If you go to joshuakors.com/military there is numerous amounts of info that may be able to help you. Another list of resources can be found on his site under: joshuakors.com/list. Hope this information helps.

  • Carl Kem says:

    I was in the army back in ’92, and they gave me a Chap. 5-13 PD. Problem is, I have no such disorder and never have had such disorder. And unless I have $40-50,000 to sue, there is nothing I can do and no lawyer will help me.

    I have injuries I received while in, but those are nothing compared to the humiliation of a PD.

    How do I change this? How do I fix it? Who can help me, if there is anyone?

  • Carl Kem says:

    I was in the army back in ’92, and they gave me a Chap. 5-13 PD. Problem is, I have no such disorder and never have had such disorder. And unless I have $40-50,000 to sue, there is nothing I can do and no lawyer will help me.

    I have injuries I received while in, but those are nothing compared to the humiliation of a PD.

    How do I change this? How do I fix it? Who can help me, if there is anyone?

  • Eliot says:

    I received a PD discharge in 88. This hasn’t prevented employment or caused other problems.
    However, I received the remainder of my reenlistment bonus after separation.
    Mine was a way for my command to cheat me since I wouldn’t give in to the politics and bullshit to which I was subjected. I challenged another administrative discharge and they went with this. There was no shrink involved…just personnel stamps on the paperwork.
    I’m applying to the VA for benefits…do you them it will create a problem?

  • Guy Gambill says:

    You may want to check out the Uniformed Services Justice & Advocacy Group (USJAG).

  • Greg A says:

    I have been dealing with this same issue for close to 20yrs, over wounds from Nam. Said what happened to me wasn’t ‘traumatic’ enough. Well the 4 months I spent in 3 different hospital was traumatic to me. Ended up calling the DC headquarters of the DAV saying that I was getting the run around from the local office. 3 days later every thing started to change, hopefully for the better. In that I never saw, talked to or knew a phys. until 3 years after I retired….

  • Sgt. Austin Bell says:

    Are there groups who defend soldiers whose “command” knowingly
    and willfully commit such actions as recommending “personality discharges”
    to cause Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress?

  • John Russell DeVore jr. says:

    I was and the Navy in 1975 October 19, 1975 I was beaten by for African-Americans the next day I was discharged unsuitability – duly diagnosed behavior disorder. At the time I discharge was under other then honorable conditions . It took me 10 years to finally get it upgraded to a general under honorable conditions.
    At that time they told me it was easier to discharge one white person then it was to discharge for African-Americans I was the only one punished, I was discharged on December 19, 1975.
    At the time this was the height of the immigration law where they tried to integrate whites and blacks and all of the nationalities .
    This started the worst days of my life that have never been the same since I joined the Navy to make a career out of it and it was cut short because of this incident .
    I haven’t said anything about this for a while now it’s time for me to speak up I think it was wrong but I got punished for something I didn’t do because I was white now I think it’s time to speak out.
    I was wondering if there’s anything you could do to help me to get back disability for this incident if not I think I’m taking this to the press to let him know what it was like back then in the 70s .
    Ever since then my life is been in ruins , for instance not been able to hold down a job I’m 61 years old and that still haunts me to this day .
    I would like to know if I am eligible for disability my next step is the VA advocate .
    I did not get to see a psychiatrist or psychologist they just discharge me .
    I was hoping there was someway you could advise me if not I’m getting attorney and I believe island titled to back disability pay and all of its amenities .


Related Articles

Political Issues Related to VA’s Limited Approval of Esketamine for Depression

WASHINGTON—A VA panel this summer opted not to add the new depression medication esketamine, Spravato, to the department’s formulary in the usual way. This came despite strong support from President Donald Trump and an effort... View Article

Ensuring Community Providers Meet Veteran Suicide Prevention Standards

WASHINGTON—As leaders from across multiple federal agencies begin work on a roadmap to combat veteran suicide, they are searching for ways to turn existing efforts in towns, cities, counties and neighborhoods across the country into... View Article


U.S. Medicine Recommends


More From department of defense dod

Department of Defense (DoD)

DoD acknowledges its medical adverse event reporting is ‘unreliable’

The process for tracking the DoD’s most serious adverse medical events is “fragmented, impeding the Defense Health Agency’s (DHA) ability to ensure that it has received complete information,” according to a new review.

Department of Defense (DoD)

Automation Speeds Results and Increases Accuracy for Point-of-Care Testing at Walter Reed NMMC

With a long history of point of care testing at both of its predecessor organizations, the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (WRNMMC) laboratory services staff were keenly aware of the advantages of using portable testing devices to obtain rapid patient assessments.

Department of Defense (DoD)

High Rate of Pectoralis Tears Among Deployed Servicemembers Lifting Weights

Lifting weights is one way servicemembers keep in peak physical condition during deployment.

Department of Defense (DoD)

DoD Study Finds That Type 2 Diabetes Increases Breast Cancer Mortality

Having Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-2) increases mortality risk in breast cancer patients, regardless of whether diabetes was diagnosed before or after breast cancer, according to a recent study.

Department of Defense (DoD)

Now Hear This: Otolaryngologist Leads Effort to Prevent Auditory Issues

Among those who are exposed to combat, it’s the weapons fire that does it. In the Navy, it’s the noise levels in engine rooms and on the decks of carriers.

Subscribe to U.S. Medicine Print Magazine

U.S. Medicine is mailed free each month to physicians, pharmacists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants and administrators working for Veterans Affairs, Department of Defense and U.S. Public Health Service.

Subscribe Now

Receive Our Email Newsletter

Stay informed about federal medical news, clinical updates and reports on government topics for the federal healthcare professional.

Sign Up