I N T R O D U C T I O N
The Nature of War Is Changing;  
Medical Care Advances to Meet the Challenges
	
	
2 0 2 6  C O M P E N D I U M  O F  F E D E R A L  M E D I C I N E  
1
Brenda L. Mooney
Editorial Director, 
U.S. Medicine
The DoD hasn’t shared much information, 
and the news coverage has been spotty, but 
we now know that, as of May 2026, about 
400 U.S. military personnel had been 
injured in the war with Iran, which began at 
the end of February. Sadly, 13 died.
Most of the  injuries were from Iranian 
drone and missile strikes targeting U.S. bases 
in the Middle East. Those include shrapnel 
wounds, burns, and traumatic brain inju-
ries (TBIs). Of course, battlefield medicine as practiced 
by U.S. military clinicians is amazing, and many of the 
injured already had returned to duty by mid-May, accord-
ing to reports. 
Still, if past history is any indication, we likely will be 
talking and writing about some of these injured service-
members – as well as others whose adverse effects will 
show up in the longer term – a half-century from now. 
The last decades have taught us an important lesson: 
Immediate injuries suffered during a war are only part of 
the story.  
For example, the Vietnam War officially ended in 
1973, 53 years ago, but thousands of U.S. veterans are still 
being treated for illnesses, especially cancer, presumed 
to be related to exposure to Agent Orange, the defoliant 
widely used during that conflict. The Gulf War ended 
in 1991, 35 years ago, but as many as 250,000 patients 
under VA care still suffer from so-called Gulf War Illness 
(GWI), a chronic, multi-system condition. Veterans who 
served in Afghanistan and Iraq following the 9/11 terror-
ist attack make up a growing number of the million veter-
ans the VA treats for pulmonary issues, although evidence 
is still emerging on connections to military service.
It is obvious that war has changed, and some pundits 
have even suggested that the burden of veteran care will 
likely be reduced as fewer servicemembers are directly in 
the line of fire. We now use drones and targeted strikes 
and technology to wage war without always endangering 
individual warfighters, they argue, and the use of individ-
ual combatants is much more limited and strategic.
I respectfully disagree that deployed military person-
nel have to be on the frontlines to suffer health conse-
quences. Many of the patients the VA treats for traumatic 
brain injury (TBI) received during the 1990s conflicts 
weren’t on top of explosive devices in war zones but 
around 33 feet away. Toxic exposures linked to a range of 
cancer types most often came from defoliants like Agent 
Orange, fumes from burn pits or even contaminated water 
at military bases, not illegal poisonous gas 
used by the enemy. Deployment itself has 
been connected to a range of mental health 
issues and problems in managing pain. And, 
even the recently injured servicemembers 
were protecting their own military bases 
when they took a hit, not on a battlefield.
As the nature of war changes, so does the 
knowledge required to provide optimal care 
to U.S. military servicemembers and veter-
ans. That is why the DoD and the VA -- and the deep 
insights of their clinicians and researchers -- are more 
important than ever.
The articles in the 2026 Compendium of Federal 
Medicine don’t just demonstrate how medical care for ser-
vicemembers is being altered but how that care is advanc-
ing and improving. Even in a high-pressure environment 
with staff shortages and financial cutbacks, medical 
professionals are finding new ways to provide cutting-
edge care.
Examples include survival-extending therapies now 
available for blood cancers like chronic lymphocytic leu-
kemia, multiple myeloma, as well as an array of B-cell 
lymphomas. Innovation also continues in treatment of 
solid tumor malignancies such as lung cancer, prostate 
cancer and anal cancer.
Other Compendium articles elucidate the efforts to 
improve quality of life for veterans with neurological con-
ditions like Parkinson’s disease and ALS. 
As with most healthcare systems, VHA and MHS 
continue a strong focus on managing chronic conditions, 
from promoting better prescribing for depression to treat-
ing unique types of high-cholesterol, combating obesity 
in a growing number of servicemembers and identifying 
optimal therapies for eczema. 
Especially with a large patient population 65 and older 
with many co-morbidities, the VA also makes a concerted 
effort to help prevent seasonal infections such as respira-
tory syncytial virus (RSV) and COVID-19.
And an important review offers an update on the 
opioid epidemic, which has been a perennial challenge 
in federal medicine. We reveal that it’s improved but 
not resolved.
Writing on behalf of the entire team at U.S. Medicine, 
we hope you find the articles interesting and useful in 
improving your patients’ care. It is clear to us that, while 
warfare might be changing, the commitment of federal 
medicine health professionals is not. 

View this content as a flipbook by clicking here.