M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military 
Medicine and Walter Reed National Military Medical 
Center, all in Bethesda, MD, offered some explanations 
for why the trends differed so much. 
“Although TRICARE began covering obesity 
medications (OMs) in 2018, prior analyses demonstrated 
limited utilization,” they wrote. “With policy changes 
in September 2024 that streamlined access and the 
introduction of newer agents such as semaglutide 
(Wegovy) and tirzepatide (Zepbound), this study 
examined updated prescribing trends and predictors of 
OM use from fiscal years (FY) 2023-2024.”
Their cross-sectional study analyzed demographic, 
clinical, and pharmacy claims data from the MHS 
Data Repository for adult TRICARE Prime and Plus 
beneficiaries ages 18-64, without Type 1 or Type 2 
diabetes and with a body mass index (BMI) of 27 or 
higher. Defined as the primary outcome was receipt 
of one or more TRICARE-approved OMs, excluding 
formulations approved for diabetes. Predictors of OM use 
were calculated by sex, age, race/ethnicity, beneficiary 
category, 
rank, 
comorbidity 
status 
(prediabetes, 
metabolic syndrome, coronary artery disease, obstructive 
sleep apnea) and care setting.
Results indicated that, among 568,232 BMI-eligible 
adult beneficiaries, 31,176 (5.5%) received at least 
one OM. Users of obesity medications were found to 
be predominantly female (81%), ages 30-59 years and 
dependents (71%). Half of those had a primary-care 
manager in direct care and half in the private sector. 
The most prescribed agents included:
	
• phentermine (41%), 
	
• semaglutide (Wegovy, 28%), 
	
• naltrexone/bupropion (20%), 
	
• phentermine/topiramate (16%) and 
	
• tirzepatide (Zepbound, 15%). 
The data underscored that, as obesity remains a sig-
nificant health threat, first-generation weight-loss med-
ications continue to play an important role in clinical 
practice. (See accompanying article, pg. xx.)
“Female sex (OR = 4.07) and senior enlisted rank 
(OR = 1.13) were associated with significantly (P < .05) 
higher odds of use; Asian/Pacific Islander (OR = 0.59), 
Hispanic (OR = 0.81), Black (OR = 0.82), and active-
duty (OR = 0.64) beneficiaries had significantly (P < 
.05) lower odds,” the researchers advised.
The authors cautioned, “Recent TRICARE coverage 
changes may further shape access and prescribing 
patterns, though their downstream effects on health 
outcomes, readiness, and costs remain uncertain.”
They 
said 
their 
findings 
“highlight 
ongoing 
knowledge gaps regarding the optimal, sustainable use 
of OM in the MHS and underscore the need for MHS-
specific effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness data 
to inform evidence-based, readiness-aligned obesity care 
strategies.”
The military continues to be under pressure about ris-
ing obesity rates within the U.S. armed forces. Earlier this 
year, a coalition of national organizations, including the 
American Security Project and Obesity Care Advocacy 
Network, sent a letter to DoD Secretary Pete Hegseth urg-
ing action on rising obesity rates within the U.S. armed 
forces. The letter warned that obesity is an “urgent threat” 
to military readiness, calling for improved nutritional 
access and fitness opportunities, among other measures. 
More than 70 national security, military and public 
health stakeholders signed the letter to the Pentagon, 
which called for stronger, evidence-based obesity 
prevention and treatment programs to maintain a 
ready force. The letter argued that addressing obesity is 
essential for national security and the long-term health 
of American forces. 
Earlier this year, a study was published in MSMR 
about the prevalence of obesity among active-component 
servicemembers. The researchers used height and 
weight data from the MHS Data Repository for ACSMs 
(cumulative n=12,262,745) and the National Health 
and Nutrition Examination Survey for civilians ages 
17-62 years (cumulative n=19,334). 
Results indicated that, from 2013 through 2023, 
obesity prevalence increased among ACSMs, from 
14.7% to 24.2%. “Although obesity rates among 
civilians were consistently higher, this gap narrowed over 
the course of the decade,” wrote the researchers from the 
national Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
in Atlanta and the Armed Forces Health Surveillance 
Division, Public Health Directorate, Defense Health 
Agency, in Silver Spring, MD. “The same pattern was 
seen in young men (ages 17-24 years). Civilians have 
greater proportions within the highest classes of BMI 
than ACSMs. Persistently high obesity prevalence 
among ACSMs overall and in young men, particularly 
since 2019, may affect military recruitment, retention, 
and ultimately, strength and readiness.”
The study advised that the “persistently high preva-
lence of obesity among civilians and growing prevalence 
of obesity among active component service members 
in general, and among young men in particular, may 
affect military recruitment, retention, and ultimately, 
	
	
2 0 2 6  C O M P E N D I U M  O F  F E D E R A L  M E D I C I N E  
8 7

View this content as a flipbook by clicking here.