and the investigative tirabrutinib and orelabrutinib, 
offered comparable or superior efficacy and substantially 
improved cardiovascular and tolerability profiles compared 
to ibrutinib. For several B-cell lymphomas, zanubrutinib 
has emerged as a preferred agent based on prospective trial 
data, making it an important tool for clinicians in the VA. 
Waldenström’s Macroglobulinemia:  
A Preferred Monotherapy
Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia is a rare, indolent 
B-cell lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma characterized by 
the infiltration of bone marrow with malignant lympho-
plasmacytic cells and the overproduction of monoclonal 
immunoglobulin M paraprotein. Median age at diagno-
sis exceeds 70 years, placing it squarely within the popu-
lation of older veterans who are most commonly treated 
at VAMCs.
The disease’s clinical manifestations arise from the direct 
infiltration of bone marrow, lymph nodes, and the spleen 
by malignant cells, which causes cytopenias, organomegaly, 
and constitutional symptoms, and the physical properties 
of the IgM paraprotein itself, which can produce hypervis-
cosity syndrome, cryoglobulinemia, peripheral neuropathy, 
and the rare but serious Bing-Neel syndrome. Treatment is 
initiated based on symptom burden, paraprotein levels, and 
evidence of organ compromise rather than disease stage 
alone; asymptomatic patients may be observed indefinitely.
Whole-genome sequencing identified the MYD88 
L265P somatic mutation in more than 90% of patients 
with the disease. A second recurrent mutation, in the 
CXCR4 gene, is present in approximately 30% to 40% of 
patients and historically predicted attenuated responses 
to BTK inhibition. These molecular features have shaped 
both treatment selection and the comparative performance 
of BTK inhibitors in clinical trials.
The pivotal data that offers support for zanubrutinib in 
Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia (WM) came from the 
phase III ASPEN trial, which randomized 201 patients 
with MYD88-mutated symptomatic WM to zanubruti-
nib or ibrutinib. The primary endpoint was the combined 
rate of complete response and very good partial response 
assessed by independent review. Although the trial did not 
meet its primary endpoint at the initial analysis, zanubruti-
nib demonstrated a numerically higher combined response 
rate of 28% vs. 19% for ibrutinib.2 
At the long-term follow-up analysis at a median of 
44.4 months, the very good partial response or complete 
response rate was 36.3% with zanubrutinib vs. 25.3% 
with ibrutinib, and the 42-month progression-free sur-
vival rate was 78% for zanubrutinib compared with 70% 
for ibrutinib.3
The 
cardiovascular 
tolerability 
advantage 
was 
pronounced and consistent throughout follow-up. Atrial 
fibrillation occurred in 2% of zanubrutinib-treated 
patients vs. 15.3% of ibrutinib-treated patients at the 
primary analysis, a difference that persisted and widened at 
longer follow-up. Diarrhea, muscle spasms, hypertension, 
and adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation 
were all more common with ibrutinib. While neutropenia 
was more common with zanubrutinib, rates of grade 3 or 
higher infections were similar between arms.
In patients with the CXCR4 mutation, zanubrutinib 
demonstrated a more favorable major response rate of 
85.7% vs. 53.8% with ibrutinib, and progression-free 
survival was substantially better in the zanubrutinib 
arm.4 That finding is clinically significant as a drug that 
performs well regardless of CXCR4 status offers a practical 
advantage in settings where molecular profiling may be 
incomplete.
The National Comprehensive Cancer Network 
responded to the ASPEN data by designating zanubrutinib 
as a category 1 preferred regimen for both primary therapy 
and previously treated Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia, 
making it the only agent to hold category 1 preferred status 
as a monotherapy across both treatment.5
Mantle Cell Lymphoma With TP53 Mutation:  
A Chemotherapy-Free Induction Platform
Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a B-cell non-Hodgkin 
lymphoma driven by the t(11;14) chromosomal 
translocation and defined by the overexpression of 
cyclin D1. It represents 6% to 7% of all non-Hodgkin 
lymphoma diagnoses in the U.S., but it carries a 
disproportionate burden among older men, the 
demographic that constitutes the core VA oncology 
patient population. Among the molecular features that 
stratify MCL outcomes, TP53 mutation stands out as 
particularly adverse: patients with TP53-mutated disease 
historically have had a median progression-free survival 
under one year with standard chemoimmunotherapy and 
poor long-term outcomes regardless of regimen intensity.
A multicenter, phase 2 study evaluated the chemother-
apy-free combination of zanubrutinib, obinutuzumab, and 
venetoclax (BOVen) in 25 previously untreated patients 
with MCL carrying a TP53 mutation with stage II bulky 
and noncontiguous disease or at stage III or IV. Patients 
achieving complete remission with undetectable minimal 
residual disease (MRD) at cycle 24 were eligible for treat-
ment discontinuation, introducing the possibility of fixed-
duration therapy in a disease where continuous treatment 
9 2 

View this content as a flipbook by clicking here.