eczema is treated. The authors emphasized that newer therapies can improve symptom control while also sup- porting longer-term disease management and quality of life.2 A Shift Away From Steroids Topical corticosteroids have long served as the foundation of eczema treatment, but their limitations—particularly with long-term use—have led clinicians to seek safer and more sustainable options. The review noted that nonsteroidal topical therapies have emerged as effective alternatives, particularly for reducing itch and improving disease control. In addition to offering the potential for longer-term management, the authors wrote, “These therapies can provide mean- ingful improvements in both clinical signs and patient- reported symptoms.” The authors also suggested that nonsteroidal options may be especially appropriate in areas where corticoste- roids are limited by safety concerns. In clinical practice, dermatologists also are seeing this shift. “For decades, topical corticosteroids anchored our treatment approach largely by default, because our nonsteroidal options were limited,” explained Faranak Kamangar, MD, president of the San Francisco Dermatological Society and department chair of dermatology at Sutter Health in Palo Alto. “That has now changed, and we have a robust toolkit—ruxolitinib, tapinarof, roflumilast and others—that are effective for reducing itch and skin symptoms, support longer disease control with fewer relapses and carry favorable safety profiles without requiring blood monitoring.” “These therapies are particularly well-suited for sensitive areas such as the face, skin folds, and genitalia,” she told the Compendium of Federal Medicine. “It’s time to rethink our prescribing paradigm and stop treating steroids as the default and everything else as second-tier.” The first topical JAK inhibitor approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was ruxolitinib, marketed as Opzelura, in 2021. The FDA designated the product for “the short-term and non-continuous chronic treatment of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis (AD) in non-immunocompromised patients 12 years of age and older whose disease is not adequately controlled with topical prescription therapies, or when those therapies are not advisable.” Of special interest to clinicians working within the Military Health System (MHS) which treats nearly 2 mil- lion children under age 18 through its TRICARE program, the FDA late last year gave the OK for use of the topical treatment in children ages 2-11 with atopic dermatitis. Specifically, the 1.5% topical JAK inhibitor was approved for the short-term and noncontinuous chronic treatment of mild to moderate AD in non- immunocompromised children 2 years of age and older whose disease is not well controlled with topi- cal prescription therapies or when those therapies are not recommended. Tapinarof cream, 1%, is an aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), while roflumilast and crisaborole are topical phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitors. Tacrolimus and pimecrolimus act by inhibiting calcineurin, thereby stopping immune system cells (T-lymphocytes) from attacking transplanted organs or causing inflammatory skin conditions. Delgocitinib 2% cream is an FDA- approved JAK inhibitor for moderate-to-severe chronic hand eczema (CHE) in adults unresponsive to or unsuitable for topical corticosteroids. The review, led by researchers from the University of California, Los Angeles, reached unanimous consensus on seven statements regarding advanced topical nonste- roidal therapies, including topical ruxolitinib, tapinarof, roflumilast, crisaborole, tacrolimus, pimecrolimus and delgocitinib. “These therapies were considered effective in reducing AD signs and symptoms, including pruritus, and appropriate as first-line agents for many patients,” according to the report. “Their use was associated with longer disease control, fewer relapses, and reduced cumulative topical corticosteroid exposure. The panel agreed that these therapies improve patient-reported outcomes, including quality of life and sleep, and can be safely incorporated into combination regimens with other topical or systemic treatments. They demonstrated favorable safety and tolerability profiles without the need for baseline or ongoing laboratory monitoring.” The panel noted that, compared with topical corticosteroids, “nonsteroidal therapies were preferred for long-term management to avoid steroid-associated adverse effects, with simplified dosing and suitability for sensitive and high-impact sites supporting adherence.” The review concluded, “Advanced topical nonsteroidal therapies represent an important evolution in AD management and are appropriate first-line options across disease severities, supporting sustained disease control and improved quality of life.” Improving Daily Life Beyond its visible symptoms, eczema can significantly disrupt daily life. 8 0
View this content as a flipbook by clicking here.